Comments on: Anyone Can Snip: Protect Your Art with Watermarks https://dy-online.com/watermarks/ Trusted Art Business Coaching and Consulting Sun, 01 May 2022 03:11:51 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4 By: Protecting your work – watermaking and sharing images on the web | Pattern & co https://dy-online.com/watermarks/#comment-18105 Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:54:29 +0000 http://artbizsuccess.com/?p=12406#comment-18105 […] discussion from Kim Bruce on Anyone Can Snip: Protect Your Art with Watermarks.  I love where she writes “My reason for watermarking is not to stop people from accessing […]

]]>
By: Essential WordPress Plugins for Artists: Showing Off Your Art — Art Biz Blog https://dy-online.com/watermarks/#comment-18104 Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:00:36 +0000 http://artbizsuccess.com/?p=12406#comment-18104 […] Watermark images […]

]]>
By: How To Take a Screen Shot With the Snipping Tool « New England's Narrow Road https://dy-online.com/watermarks/#comment-18103 Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:12:42 +0000 http://artbizsuccess.com/?p=12406#comment-18103 […] Anyone Can Snip: Protect Your Art with Watermarks (artbizblog.com) […]

]]>
By: Traci Bunkers https://dy-online.com/watermarks/#comment-18102 Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:01:01 +0000 http://artbizsuccess.com/?p=12406#comment-18102 Todd McPhetridge. excellent photo Todd! I've been doing my watermark the same way--under the photo. But I didn't think of creating an action in photoshop to do it. I just use layers, and drag it over. I'll have to try out the actions. I'm not very familiar with them.]]> In reply to Todd McPhetridge.

excellent photo Todd! I’ve been doing my watermark the same way–under the photo. But I didn’t think of creating an action in photoshop to do it. I just use layers, and drag it over. I’ll have to try out the actions. I’m not very familiar with them.

]]>
By: Alyson Stanfield https://dy-online.com/watermarks/#comment-18101 Sun, 15 Apr 2012 02:55:47 +0000 http://artbizsuccess.com/?p=12406#comment-18101 I guess because I know both Kim and Lisa that I saw this differently – as a civilized discussion. Lisa is great at providing another opinion (she’s done so with me on many occasions), but she has never done it with malice or ugliness.
It’s good to have different voices on this blog, but it’s easier to understand intent when we’re face to face in the same room together.
I’m grateful that you’re all here. You, too, Sari!

]]>
By: Kim Bruce https://dy-online.com/watermarks/#comment-18100 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:38:27 +0000 http://artbizsuccess.com/?p=12406#comment-18100 Sari Grove. Sari, if there was a Like button I would give you the thumbs up!]]> In reply to Sari Grove.

Sari, if there was a Like button I would give you the thumbs up!

]]>
By: Sari Grove https://dy-online.com/watermarks/#comment-18099 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:33:30 +0000 http://artbizsuccess.com/?p=12406#comment-18099 Gee…One could cut the tension in this ‘world is a friendly place’ with a knife? Agree to disagree & let’s thank our free guest blogger for her free time while she is in the middle of an art show herself…I’ve been back & forth on this one myself, & am trying to get some factual results from doing some & not doing others…We are all hammering this out right now as we speak, & discussion is good, but not if it is starting to descend…Let’s be honest, both of you are great artists, & both of your opinions are valid…It happens…

]]>
By: Kim Bruce https://dy-online.com/watermarks/#comment-18098 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 21:16:12 +0000 http://artbizsuccess.com/?p=12406#comment-18098 Lisa, my intent was not, as you say “looking to persuade and scare people into watermarking”. I’m sorry that you took it that way.
My only objective was to offer a solution to those who may be looking for one.
As artists we spend a lot of time naming our images and embedding metadata only to turn around to find that it can all be removed by a simple snipping tool.
To reiterate; watermarking is a personal choice.

]]>
By: Lisa Call https://dy-online.com/watermarks/#comment-18097 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 18:26:24 +0000 http://artbizsuccess.com/?p=12406#comment-18097 Kim Bruce. Kim, I appreciate your attempt to educate, what I am responding to was your use of fear to motivate. Leading off with the "are you afraid" question didn't indicate to me you were looking to inform, instead it indicated to me you were looking to persuade and scare people into watermarking. Some people view the universe as a scary place where they need to take precautions to protect themselves from the badness and some people view it as a friendly place where good comes their way and openness and sharing are how they choose to live. I see your article as presenting the first point of view and I am looking to present the other side of the coin. There are no "facts" to prove either way is correct because those statistics would be impossible to gather. We can kind of count how many people have had an image lose an attribution (take a poll) but it is nearly impossible to quantify the lost opportunities that might be associated with this. It's also essentially impossible to calculate the probability of this happening as counting the number of images on the internet is nearly impossible. I asked about the facts to point out that this isn't a discussion about facts but instead a discussion about world views. ---lisa]]> In reply to Kim Bruce.

Kim,
I appreciate your attempt to educate, what I am responding to was your use of fear to motivate. Leading off with the “are you afraid” question didn’t indicate to me you were looking to inform, instead it indicated to me you were looking to persuade and scare people into watermarking.
Some people view the universe as a scary place where they need to take precautions to protect themselves from the badness and some people view it as a friendly place where good comes their way and openness and sharing are how they choose to live.
I see your article as presenting the first point of view and I am looking to present the other side of the coin.
There are no “facts” to prove either way is correct because those statistics would be impossible to gather. We can kind of count how many people have had an image lose an attribution (take a poll) but it is nearly impossible to quantify the lost opportunities that might be associated with this. It’s also essentially impossible to calculate the probability of this happening as counting the number of images on the internet is nearly impossible.
I asked about the facts to point out that this isn’t a discussion about facts but instead a discussion about world views.
—lisa

]]>
By: Kim Bruce https://dy-online.com/watermarks/#comment-18096 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:17:06 +0000 http://artbizsuccess.com/?p=12406#comment-18096 Lisa Call. Lisa, I was going to find you data to back up the risks of having your images online, but then I realized that is not what I was writing about. A simple Google search will more than likely provide you the information you seek. I wrote the article to let artists know about snipping tools and how they strip out any metadata that has been embedded. So even though we think we are doing a good job by embedding our file info and naming out images we can never be 100% sure that our name is going to travel with the image. As mentioned in the article, most people are good and just don’t know about attribution. My intent here was to help artists and nice people understand how snipping works and maybe a few more people will provide credits the next time they snip or post someone else’s image online. The bad guys will always find a work around. Other than not having my work on line at all, I know there is nothing I can do to prevent images of my work from being stolen and maybe even reproduced in China. Everything thing on the internet is vulnerable to theft; it’s the nature of the beast. I submit that the advantages and exposure for artists being online far out weighs the disadvantages. Watermarking is a personal choice and can be done in such a way as not to interfere with the work itself. If I can provide the “good people” a trail back to me, then I choose to do so, you don’t have too.]]> In reply to Lisa Call.

Lisa, I was going to find you data to back up the risks of having your images online, but then I realized that is not what I was writing about. A simple Google search will more than likely provide you the information you seek.
I wrote the article to let artists know about snipping tools and how they strip out any metadata that has been embedded. So even though we think we are doing a good job by embedding our file info and naming out images we can never be 100% sure that our name is going to travel with the image.
As mentioned in the article, most people are good and just don’t know about attribution. My intent here was to help artists and nice people understand how snipping works and maybe a few more people will provide credits the next time they snip or post someone else’s image online. The bad guys will always find a work around.
Other than not having my work on line at all, I know there is nothing I can do to prevent images of my work from being stolen and maybe even reproduced in China.
Everything thing on the internet is vulnerable to theft; it’s the nature of the beast. I submit that the advantages and exposure for artists being online far out weighs the disadvantages.
Watermarking is a personal choice and can be done in such a way as not to interfere with the work itself. If I can provide the “good people” a trail back to me, then I choose to do so, you don’t have too.

]]>