I hear ya. But institutions are infinitely more interesting and worthy when they have a personality. PLUS, we want to know who we’re reading from: what are their credentials? More importantly, why should we listen to them?
Even if you do add others, you can still keep your personality – a la copyblogger.
Glad to hear that I’m not alone in wanting this for your site.
Alyson: Mainly because I was intending to start something of an institution that would incorporate various writers and columns. It’s a great idea, but not something that is remotely interesting to people at this early stage.
In fact, most of the feedback I’ve been getting has been, “Where are you? We want more of your personality.” So I’m headed toward ditching the neutral objectivity and injecting myself fully into blogging, on a blog, not an e-magazine.
And thanks again for your site! It’s been extremely helpful to me as I figure these things out…
Eric: Good work! I wonder why you don’t identify yourself on the site. Is there a reason for that?
]]>